Re: Romh

[ Back to the Board ]


Posted by (wraith) (nas-1-121.boston.navinet.net/216.67.1.121) on November 30, 1999 at 15:32:05: In Reply to: Romh posted by Spinner 8 on November 30, 1999 at 11:57:54:

> this looks really funky at a low resolution :P

Yeah? Well . . . well . . . 800x600! Yeah!

What I don't get . . . is if I'm using absolute pixel sizing, wtf do the frames get sized wrong at 640x480?

Oh yeah, and don't use 3.x browsers. They suck ass.




Responses:

Respond Here




- Name -

- E-Mail Address -

- Subject -

- Message -

- Optional Link URL -

- Link Title -

- Optional Image URL -